Radeon HD 7750M vs NVS 810

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7750M is positioned at rank 353 and the NVS 810 is on rank 309, so the NVS 810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7750M

#343

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

993%

#345

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

900%

#346

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

898%

#350

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

817%

#351

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

811%

#353

Radeon HD 7750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

100%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

98%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

97%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

97%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

96%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

96%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 810

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

92%

#294

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8690%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

100%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

99%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

96%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

96%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

94%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

93%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

92%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

91%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

90%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

89%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

89%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

89%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

87%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

84%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The NVS 810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7750M.

Insight	Radeon HD 7750M	NVS 810
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the NVS 810 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 7750M Benchmark Check

NVS 810 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7750M and NVS 810

Radeon HD 7750M

The Radeon HD 7750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7750M scores 1,191 and the NVS 810 reaches 1,192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7750M is built on GCN 1.0 while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon HD 7750M) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750M) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810).

Feature	Radeon HD 7750M	NVS 810
G3D Mark Score	1,191	1,192
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	512 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5888 TFLOPS	1.058 TFLOPS ×2+80%
ROPs	16	16 ×2
TMUs	32	32 ×2
L1 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7750M	NVS 810
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7750M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 has 4 GB. The NVS 810 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7750M) vs 1 MB (NVS 810) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 7750M	NVS 810
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon HD 7750M) vs 12 (12_1) (NVS 810). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 8.

Feature	Radeon HD 7750M	NVS 810
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6	8+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750M) vs NVENC 5 (NVS 810). Decoder: UVD3 vs NVDEC 2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7750M) vs H.264,H.265 (NVS 810).

Feature	Radeon HD 7750M	NVS 810
Encoder	VCE 1.0	NVENC 5
Decoder	UVD3	NVDEC 2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7750M draws 28W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 83.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7750M) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon HD 7750M	NVS 810
TDP	28W-59%	68W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	198mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	42.5+143%	17.5