Radeon HD 8280 vs GeForce 7900 GS
Radeon HD 8280
Popular choices:
GeForce 7900 GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8280 is positioned at rank 472 and the GeForce 7900 GS is on rank 692, so the Radeon HD 8280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8280
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7900 GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 7900 GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8280 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8280 | GeForce 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 7900 GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 7900 GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8280 | GeForce 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8280 and GeForce 7900 GS
Radeon HD 8280
The Radeon HD 8280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 261 points.
GeForce 7900 GS
The GeForce 7900 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 262 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8280 scores 261 and the GeForce 7900 GS reaches 262 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8280 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 7900 GS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8280) vs 224 (GeForce 7900 GS).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8280 | GeForce 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 261 | 262 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+186% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8280 | GeForce 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8280 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7900 GS has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 8280 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8280 | GeForce 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8280 draws 50W versus the GeForce 7900 GS's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 8280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8280) vs 350W (GeForce 7900 GS). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8280 | GeForce 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | — | 198mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 5.2+206% | 1.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8280 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce 7900 GS launched at $259 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (Radeon HD 8280) vs 5.2 (GeForce 7900 GS) — the GeForce 7900 GS offers 0% better value. The Radeon HD 8280 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8280 | GeForce 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-81% | $259 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Codename | Venus | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | April 1 2013 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #745 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8280 and GeForce 7900 GS
