
Radeon HD 8280 vs Radeon HD 8350G

Radeon HD 8280
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8350G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8280 is positioned at rank 472 and the Radeon HD 8350G is on rank 222, so the Radeon HD 8350G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8280
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8350G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8280 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8350G.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8280 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8280 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8280 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8280 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8280 and Radeon HD 8350G

Radeon HD 8280
The Radeon HD 8280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 261 points.

Radeon HD 8350G
The Radeon HD 8350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 258 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8280 scores 261 and the Radeon HD 8350G reaches 258 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8280 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8350G uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8280) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8350G). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8280) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8350G). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8280 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 261+1% | 258 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1024+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+78% |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1000 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 256 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8280 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8280 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8350G has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 8280 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 8280) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8350G) — the Radeon HD 8350G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8280 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8280 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 8350G's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon HD 8280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8280) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8350G). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8280 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 5.2+160% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8280 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 8350G launched at $50 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (Radeon HD 8280) vs 5.2 (Radeon HD 8350G) — the Radeon HD 8350G offers 0% better value. The Radeon HD 8280 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8280 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Codename | Venus | Pitcairn |
| Release | April 1 2013 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #745 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















