Radeon HD 8400 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT
Radeon HD 8400
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 2600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8400 is positioned at rank 142 and the Radeon HD 2600 XT is on rank 677, so the Radeon HD 8400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2600 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 2600 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8400.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8400 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $40), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 666.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+666.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon HD 2600 XT
Radeon HD 8400
The Radeon HD 8400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points. Launch price was $349.
Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 283 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8400 scores 271 and the Radeon HD 2600 XT reaches 283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8400 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 2600 XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8400) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8400) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2600 XT).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 271 | 283+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+167% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.56 TFLOPS+268% | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+567% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8400) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the Radeon HD 8400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8400 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 2600 XT's 25W — a 155.6% difference. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 25W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 11.3+707% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8400 launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 8400 costs 87.5% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 54.2 (Radeon HD 8400) vs 7.1 (Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the Radeon HD 8400 offers 663.4% better value. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-85% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-88% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.2+663% | 7.1 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Thames |
| Release | March 5 2012 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #460 | #883 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8400 and Radeon HD 2600 XT
