
Radeon HD 8400

Radeon R5 235X
Radeon HD 8400 vs Radeon R5 235X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 8400 vs Radeon R5 235X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 8400 vs Radeon R5 235X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 8400
2012Why buy it
- ✅19.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 200W vs 80W.
Radeon R5 235X
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 200W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8400 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌63.3% HIGHER MSRP$49 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8400 vs Radeon R5 235X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 8400
The Radeon HD 8400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R5 235X
The Radeon R5 235X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8400 scores 271 and the Radeon R5 235X reaches 277 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8400 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 235X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8400) vs 640 (Radeon R5 235X). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8400) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 271 | 277+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.56 TFLOPS+111% | 1.216 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 235X carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 235X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8400 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 235X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8400) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 235X) — the Radeon HD 8400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (Radeon HD 8400) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 235X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8400) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 235X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8400 draws 200W versus the Radeon R5 235X's 80W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R5 235X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8400) vs 350W (Radeon R5 235X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 80W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 3.5+150% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 8400 came in at $30, while the Radeon R5 235X launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8400 was 38.8% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon HD 8400) vs 5.7 (Radeon R5 235X) — the Radeon HD 8400 offers 57.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 235X (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8400 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-39% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0+58% | 5.7 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Cape Verde |
| Release | March 5 2012 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #460 | #655 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














