Radeon HD 6370M vs Radeon HD 8400

AMD

Radeon HD 6370M

2011Core: 680 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8400

2012Core: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6370M vs Radeon HD 8400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6370M vs Radeon HD 8400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6370M vs Radeon HD 8400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6370M

2011

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8400 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8400

2012

Why buy it

  • 2.9% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8400 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.9% in average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6370M instead at 276 vs 271, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6370M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6370M vs Radeon HD 8400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6370M

The Radeon HD 6370M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 276 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8400

The Radeon HD 8400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6370M scores 276 and the Radeon HD 8400 reaches 271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6370M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 8400 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6370M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8400). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6370M) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8400).

FeatureRadeon HD 6370MRadeon HD 8400
G3D Mark Score
276+2%
271
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960
1280+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS
2.56 TFLOPS+96%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
80+67%
L1 Cache
192 KB
320 KB+67%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6370MRadeon HD 8400
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6370M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8400 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6370M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6370M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8400.

FeatureRadeon HD 6370MRadeon HD 8400
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6370M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8400's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6370M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8400). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 6370MRadeon HD 8400
TDP
75W-63%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
3.7+164%
1.4
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 8400 (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6370MRadeon HD 8400
MSRP
$30
Codename
Blackcomb
Pitcairn
Release
January 4 2011
March 5 2012
Ranking
#654
#460

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.