NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 6370M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 6370M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 6370M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

NVS 310

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6370M

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6370M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (276 vs 275), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

NVS 310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

NVS 310 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6370M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 6370M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVS 310

The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

Radeon HD 6370M

The Radeon HD 6370M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 276 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 310 scores 275 and the Radeon HD 6370M reaches 276 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 310 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6370M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 310) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6370M). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6370M).

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 6370M
G3D Mark Score	275	276
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2	960+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2	1.306 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs	16 ×2	32+100%
TMUs	32 ×2	48+50%
L1 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 6370M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 310 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6370M carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 6370M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 310 and System on the Radeon HD 6370M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 310) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6370M) — the NVS 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 6370M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 310 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 6370M's 75W — a 9.8% difference. The NVS 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 310) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6370M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 6370M
TDP	68W-9%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.0+8%	3.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is NVS 310 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 6370M
MSRP	$159	—
Codename	GM107	Blackcomb
Release	November 4 2015	January 4 2011
Ranking	#826	#654

Search NVS 310 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6370M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.