NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 8400E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 8400E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 8400E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

NVS 310

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 68W instead of 200W, a 132W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
430% HIGHER MSRP
$159 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8400E

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Delivers 431.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌194.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 68W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8400E is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (276 vs 275), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

NVS 310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8400E makes the most sense to buy today. It is $129 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $159, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 431.9% (9.2 vs 1.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8400E is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, NVS 310 has the stronger long-term case.

NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 8400E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVS 310

The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

Radeon HD 8400E

The Radeon HD 8400E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 276 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 310 scores 275 and the Radeon HD 8400E reaches 276 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 310 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8400E uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (NVS 310) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8400E). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8400E).

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 8400E
G3D Mark Score	275	276
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2	1280+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2	2.56 TFLOPS+142%
ROPs	16 ×2	32+100%
TMUs	32 ×2	80+150%
L1 Cache	256 KB	320 KB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 8400E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 310 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8400E. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 310) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8400E) — the NVS 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 8400E
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 310 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 8400E's 200W — a 98.5% difference. The NVS 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 310) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8400E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 8400E
TDP	68W-66%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.0+186%	1.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the NVS 310 came in at $159, while the Radeon HD 8400E launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8400E was 81.1% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (NVS 310) vs 9.2 (Radeon HD 8400E) — the Radeon HD 8400E offers 441.2% better value. The newer card here is NVS 310 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 8400E
MSRP	$159	$30-81%
Performance per Dollar	1.7	9.2+441%
Codename	GM107	Pitcairn
Release	November 4 2015	March 5 2012
Ranking	#826	#460

Search NVS 310 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8400E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.