NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVS 310
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 2600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 310 is positioned at rank 305 and the Radeon HD 2600 XT is on rank 677, so the NVS 310 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar NVS 310
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2600 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 2600 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the NVS 310.
| Insight | NVS 310 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The NVS 310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the NVS 310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $40), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 288.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | NVS 310 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+288.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of NVS 310 and Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVS 310
The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.
Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 283 points.
Graphics Performance
The NVS 310 scores 275 and the Radeon HD 2600 XT reaches 283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 310 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 2600 XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 310) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2600 XT).
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 275 | 283+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2+7% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+52% | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 ×2+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 ×2+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+433% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 310) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the NVS 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 310 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 2600 XT's 25W — a 92.5% difference. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 310) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W | 25W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.0 | 11.3+183% |
Value Analysis
The NVS 310 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199 and now averages $40. The NVS 310 costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.5 (NVS 310) vs 7.1 (Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the NVS 310 offers 287.3% better value. The NVS 310 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-20% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-75% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5+287% | 7.1 |
| Codename | GM107 | Thames |
| Release | November 4 2015 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #826 | #883 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on NVS 310 and Radeon HD 2600 XT
