NVS 310
VS
Radeon HD 7450A

NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 7450A

NVS 310

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7450A

2012Boost: 1250 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 310 is positioned at rank 305 and the Radeon HD 7450A is on rank 270, so the Radeon HD 7450A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 310

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
91%
#290
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
8539%
#305
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
100%
#306
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
100%
#308
FirePro 3D V3750
MSRP: $199|Avg: $25
99%
#309
NVS 810
MSRP: $700|Avg: $80
98%
#310
GRID P40-2Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340
97%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
95%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
94%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
92%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
91%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
91%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
89%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
88%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
88%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7450A

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2015%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1936%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1913%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1910%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1906%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1895%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1871%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1864%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1847%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1842%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1820%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1816%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1783%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1782%
#254
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2222%
#269
Radeon HD 6450
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
100%
#270
Radeon HD 7450A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
100%
#272
Radeon HD 3450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#273
Radeon HD 6230
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#274
Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
98%
#275
Radeon E6760
MSRP: $240|Avg: $79
98%
#277
Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#278
Radeon R4
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#280
Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
95%
#281
Radeon HD 6410D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
94%
#283
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
MSRP: $130|Avg: $130
92%
#284
Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7450A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the NVS 310.

InsightNVS 310Radeon HD 7450A
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%)
Leading raw performance (+4.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The NVS 310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the NVS 310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $40), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 281.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightNVS 310Radeon HD 7450A
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+281.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 310 and Radeon HD 7450A

NVIDIA

NVS 310

The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7450A

The Radeon HD 7450A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 288 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The NVS 310 scores 275 and the Radeon HD 7450A reaches 288 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 310 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7450A uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (NVS 310) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7450A). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7450A). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureNVS 310Radeon HD 7450A
G3D Mark Score
275
288+5%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512 ×2
1792+250%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.058 TFLOPS ×2
2.867 TFLOPS+171%
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1250 MHz+21%
ROPs
16 ×2
32+100%
TMUs
32 ×2
112+250%
L1 Cache
256 KB
448 KB+75%
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureNVS 310Radeon HD 7450A
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 310) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7450A) — the NVS 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureNVS 310Radeon HD 7450A
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 310 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 7450A's 200W — a 98.5% difference. The NVS 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 310) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7450A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureNVS 310Radeon HD 7450A
TDP
68W-66%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
4.0+186%
1.4
💰

Value Analysis

The NVS 310 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon HD 7450A launched at $80 and now averages $40. The NVS 310 costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.5 (NVS 310) vs 7.2 (Radeon HD 7450A) — the NVS 310 offers 281.9% better value. The NVS 310 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureNVS 310Radeon HD 7450A
MSRP
$159
$80-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$10-75%
$40
Performance per Dollar
27.5+282%
7.2
Codename
GM107
Tahiti
Release
November 4 2015
January 31 2012
Ranking
#826
#454