
NVS 310

Radeon R5 235X
NVS 310 vs Radeon R5 235X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
NVS 310 vs Radeon R5 235X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
NVS 310 vs Radeon R5 235X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
NVS 310
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 80W, a 12W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 168mm, a 23mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌224.5% HIGHER MSRP$159 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Radeon R5 235X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 226.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 68W.
- ❌15.9% longer card at 168mm vs 145mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
NVS 310 vs Radeon R5 235X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVS 310
The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

Radeon R5 235X
The Radeon R5 235X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The NVS 310 scores 275 and the Radeon R5 235X reaches 277 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 310 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 235X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (NVS 310) vs 640 (Radeon R5 235X). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235X). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 275 | 277 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.216 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz+3% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 ×2 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+60% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The NVS 310 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 235X carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 235X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 310 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 235X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 310) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 235X) — the NVS 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (NVS 310) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 235X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Fermi NVENC (NVS 310) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 235X). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Fermi NVENC | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 310 draws 68W versus the Radeon R5 235X's 80W — a 16.2% difference. The NVS 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 310) vs 350W (Radeon R5 235X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W-15% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.0+14% | 3.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the NVS 310 came in at $159, while the Radeon R5 235X launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 235X was 69.2% cheaper ($110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (NVS 310) vs 5.7 (Radeon R5 235X) — the Radeon R5 235X offers 235.3% better value. The newer card here is NVS 310 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | NVS 310 | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | $49-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 5.7+235% |
| Codename | GM107 | Cape Verde |
| Release | November 4 2015 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #826 | #655 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














