NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 8280G

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 8280G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 8280G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

NVS 310

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
218% HIGHER MSRP
$159 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌36% higher power demand at 68W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8280G

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Delivers 212.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 68W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

NVS 310 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (275 vs 270), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

NVS 310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8280G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $109 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $159, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 212.2% (5.4 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8280G is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, NVS 310 has the stronger long-term case.

NVS 310 vs Radeon HD 8280G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVS 310

The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

Radeon HD 8280G

The Radeon HD 8280G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 310 scores 275 and the Radeon HD 8280G reaches 270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 310 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8280G uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (NVS 310) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8280G). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8280G). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 775 MHz.

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 8280G
G3D Mark Score	275+2%	270
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2	640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2+7%	0.992 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1033 MHz+33%	775 MHz
ROPs	16 ×2	16
TMUs	32 ×2	40+25%
L1 Cache	256 KB+60%	160 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 8280G
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 310 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8280G. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 310) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8280G) — the NVS 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 8280G
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 310 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 8280G's 50W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon HD 8280G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 310) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8280G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 8280G
TDP	68W	50W-26%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.0	5.4+35%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the NVS 310 came in at $159, while the Radeon HD 8280G launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8280G was 68.6% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (NVS 310) vs 5.4 (Radeon HD 8280G) — the Radeon HD 8280G offers 217.6% better value. The newer card here is NVS 310 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	NVS 310	Radeon HD 8280G
MSRP	$159	$50-69%
Performance per Dollar	1.7	5.4+218%
Codename	GM107	Venus
Release	November 4 2015	April 1 2013
Ranking	#826	#745

Search NVS 310 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8280G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.