GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 6370M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 6370M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 6370M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 510

2022

Why buy it

✅20.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Radeon HD 6370M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 510 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon HD 6370M

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 510 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 510 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.0% in average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5.1% in PassMark G3D (290 vs 276), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 510 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 510 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 6370M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 510

The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

Radeon HD 6370M

The Radeon HD 6370M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 276 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 510 scores 290 versus the Radeon HD 6370M's 276 — the GeForce 510 leads by 5.1%. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 6370M uses TeraScale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6370M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6370M).

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 6370M
G3D Mark Score	290+5%	276
Architecture	Ampere	TeraScale 2
Process Node	8 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+113%	960
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+262%	1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	2 MB+953%	0.19 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 510 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6370M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 6370M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6370M carries 1 GB. GeForce 510 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 510 and System on the Radeon HD 6370M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6370M) — the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 6370M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 6370M's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6370M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 6370M
TDP	25W-67%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.6+214%	3.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 510 (2022 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 6370M
MSRP	$99	—
Codename	GA107	Blackcomb
Release	Maio 2022	January 4 2011
Ranking	#407	#654

Search GeForce 510 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6370M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.