Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual
VS
Radeon R5 240

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual vs Radeon R5 240

AMD

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 825 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual is positioned at rank 542 and the Radeon R5 240 is on rank 135, so the Radeon R5 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual

#532
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2911%
#534
2639%
#535
2632%
#539
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2393%
#540
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2377%
#542
100%
#543
Radeon HD 7640G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#544
Radeon R9 M275
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#545
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
99%
#546
98%
#547
98%
#548
Radeon R5 M335
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#549
98%
#550
98%
#551
97%
#552
97%
#553
Radeon R5 M255
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#554
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
96%
#555
Mobility Radeon HD 530v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#556
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 240

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
767%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
737%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
728%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
727%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
725%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
721%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
712%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
710%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
703%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
701%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
693%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
691%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
679%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
678%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
99%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#120
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
846%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
100%
#136
Radeon HD 8570
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#137
Radeon R5 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
100%
#139
GeForce GT 730
MSRP: $89|Avg: $45
98%
#140
Radeon HD 8400E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
97%
#142
Radeon HD 8400
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
95%
#143
Radeon HD 5750
MSRP: $130|Avg: $25
95%
#145
Radeon HD 8330E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
92%
#146
Radeon HD 8670D
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
91%
#147
Radeon R7 A370
MSRP: $149|Avg: $51
91%
#148
Radeon HD 5770
MSRP: $159|Avg: $159
90%
#149
Radeon HD 4770
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
88%
#150
Radeon HD 8510G
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 240 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M DualRadeon R5 240
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R5 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $150), it costs 93% less, resulting in a 1397.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M DualRadeon R5 240
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1397.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual and Radeon R5 240

AMD

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 559 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 240

The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual scores 559 and the Radeon R5 240 reaches 558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual) vs 320 (Radeon R5 240).

FeatureRadeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M DualRadeon R5 240
G3D Mark Score
559
558
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+100%
320

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M DualRadeon R5 240
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 240 has 2 GB. The Radeon R5 240 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M DualRadeon R5 240
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_1 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual) vs 12_0 (Radeon R5 240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M DualRadeon R5 240
DirectX
11_1
12_0+9%
Max Displays
0
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 240). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureRadeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M DualRadeon R5 240
Encoder
UVD 3
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3
UVD 3.1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 240's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual) vs 250W (Radeon R5 240). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M DualRadeon R5 240
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
250W-29%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
1mm
168mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
11.2
18.6+66%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R5 240 launched at $59 and now averages $10. The Radeon R5 240 costs 93.3% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.7 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual) vs 55.8 (Radeon R5 240) — the Radeon R5 240 offers 1408.1% better value.

FeatureRadeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M DualRadeon R5 240
MSRP
$150
$59-61%
Avg Price (30d)
$150
$10-93%
Performance per Dollar
3.7
55.8+1408%
Codename
Oland
Release
August 1 2013
October 8 2013
Ranking
#863
#911