GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual
GeForce GTS 250
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 250 is positioned at rank 246 and the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual is on rank 542, so the GeForce GTS 250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 250
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTS 250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTS 250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTS 250 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $150), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 663.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+663.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual
GeForce GTS 250
The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.
Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual
The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 559 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 250 scores 569 and the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual reaches 559 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 569+2% | 559 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 640+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 250 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual has 512 MB. The GeForce GTS 250 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 250) vs 11_1 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11_1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP5 (GeForce GTS 250) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 250 draws 106W versus the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual's 50W — a 71.8% difference. The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTS 250) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 50W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4 | 11.2+107% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTS 250 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTS 250 costs 86.7% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.4 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 3.7 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual) — the GeForce GTS 250 offers 667.6% better value. The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-14% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-87% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.4+668% | 3.7 |
| Codename | GF106 | — |
| Release | September 13 2010 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #791 | #863 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8500M Dual
