Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual vs FirePro V3900
Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual
Popular choices:
FirePro V3900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual is positioned at rank 511 and the FirePro V3900 is on rank 206, so the FirePro V3900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V3900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V3900 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FirePro V3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FirePro V3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual and FirePro V3900
Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 635 points.
FirePro V3900
The FirePro V3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 631 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual scores 635 and the FirePro V3900 reaches 631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual) vs 1,280 (FirePro V3900).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FirePro V3900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 635 | 631 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FirePro V3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V3900 has 1 GB. The FirePro V3900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FirePro V3900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual draws 50W versus the FirePro V3900's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual) vs 350W (FirePro V3900). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FirePro V3900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.7+202% | 4.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro V3900 launched at $119 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.2 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual) vs 21.0 (FirePro V3900) — the Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual offers 1% better value. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FirePro V3900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $119-21% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.2 | 21.0 |
| Codename | — | Cayman |
| Release | August 1 2013 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #881 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual and FirePro V3900
