Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual vs FireStream 9170
Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual
Popular choices:
FireStream 9170
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual is positioned at rank 511 and the FireStream 9170 is on rank 393, so the FireStream 9170 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9170
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FireStream 9170 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FireStream 9170 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FireStream 9170 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FireStream 9170 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 52.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FireStream 9170 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+52.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual and FireStream 9170
Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 635 points.
FireStream 9170
The FireStream 9170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 647 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual scores 635 and the FireStream 9170 reaches 647 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual) vs 1,600 (FireStream 9170).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FireStream 9170 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 635 | 647+2% |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1600+108% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FireStream 9170 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FireStream 9170 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual draws 50W versus the FireStream 9170's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual) vs 350W (FireStream 9170). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FireStream 9170 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.7+338% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FireStream 9170 launched at $1999 and now averages $20. The FireStream 9170 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.2 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual) vs 32.4 (FireStream 9170) — the FireStream 9170 offers 52.8% better value. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual | FireStream 9170 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-92% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $20-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.2 | 32.4+53% |
| Codename | — | Cypress |
| Release | August 1 2013 | June 23 2010 |
| Ranking | #881 | #631 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual and FireStream 9170
