Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
VS
FirePro 3D V8700

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual vs FirePro 3D V8700

AMD

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz
VS

FirePro 3D V8700

2014Core: 850 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is positioned at rank 336 and the FirePro 3D V8700 is on rank 365, so the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

#326
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
888%
#328
805%
#329
803%
#333
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
730%
#334
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
725%
#336
100%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
99%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
93%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
91%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
91%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8700

#350
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
18466%
#365
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
100%
#366
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
100%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
99%
#368
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
98%
#369
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
98%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
89%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
85%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
83%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
81%
#374
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
76%
#375
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
76%
#376
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
76%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
75%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
72%
#379
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
70%
#380
Tesla M2090
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V8700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro 3D V8700
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (254mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $1,229), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 12353.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro 3D V8700
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+12353.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,229)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual and FirePro 3D V8700

AMD

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.

AMD

FirePro 3D V8700

The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual scores 1,222 and the FirePro 3D V8700 reaches 1,206 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700).

FeatureRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro 3D V8700
G3D Mark Score
1,222+1%
1,206
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
2048+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro 3D V8700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB. The FirePro 3D V8700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro 3D V8700
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual draws 50W versus the FirePro 3D V8700's 274W — a 138.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro 3D V8700
TDP
50W-82%
274W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
254mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
24.4+455%
4.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the FirePro 3D V8700 launched at $1499 and now averages $1229. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual costs 99.2% less ($1219 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 122.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) vs 1.0 (FirePro 3D V8700) — the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers 12120% better value. The FirePro 3D V8700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro 3D V8700
MSRP
$100-93%
$1499
Avg Price (30d)
$10-99%
$1229
Performance per Dollar
122.2+12120%
1.0
Codename
Tahiti
Release
August 1 2013
January 18 2014
Ranking
#881
#423