
Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual vs FirePro 3D V8700

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V8700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is positioned at rank 336 and the FirePro 3D V8700 is on rank 365, so the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V8700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $1,229), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 12353.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+12353.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,229) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual and FirePro 3D V8700

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.

FirePro 3D V8700
The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual scores 1,222 and the FirePro 3D V8700 reaches 1,206 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,222+1% | 1,206 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB. The FirePro 3D V8700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual draws 50W versus the FirePro 3D V8700's 274W — a 138.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-82% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 254mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 24.4+455% | 4.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the FirePro 3D V8700 launched at $1499 and now averages $1229. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual costs 99.2% less ($1219 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 122.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) vs 1.0 (FirePro 3D V8700) — the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers 12120% better value. The FirePro 3D V8700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual | FirePro 3D V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-93% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-99% | $1229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.2+12120% | 1.0 |
| Codename | — | Tahiti |
| Release | August 1 2013 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #881 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















