Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
VS
FirePro V5900

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual vs FirePro V5900

AMD

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz
VS

FirePro V5900

2011Core: 600 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is positioned at rank 336 and the FirePro V5900 is on rank 290, so the FirePro V5900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

#326
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
888%
#328
805%
#329
803%
#333
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
730%
#334
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
725%
#336
100%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
99%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
93%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
91%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
91%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5900

#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
97%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
97%
#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
95%
#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
94%
#275
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7171%
#290
FirePro V5900
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
100%
#291
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
98%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
96%
#295
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
96%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
95%
#300
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
94%
#301
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
94%
#302
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
92%
#303
FirePro 3D V3700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
88%
#304
GRID T4-1Q
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600
85%
#305
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro V5900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual.

InsightRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro V5900
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 48.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro V5900
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+48.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual and FirePro V5900

AMD

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.

AMD

FirePro V5900

The FirePro V5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual scores 1,222 and the FirePro V5900 reaches 1,232 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) vs 512 (FirePro V5900).

FeatureRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro V5900
G3D Mark Score
1,222
1,232
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro V5900
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V5900 has 2 GB. The FirePro V5900 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro V5900
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual draws 50W versus the FirePro V5900's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) vs 350W (FirePro V5900). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro V5900
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Height
112mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
24.4+49%
16.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the FirePro V5900 launched at $599 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 122.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) vs 82.1 (FirePro V5900) — the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers 48.8% better value. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 DualFirePro V5900
MSRP
$100-83%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$10-33%
$15
Performance per Dollar
122.2+49%
82.1
Codename
Cayman
Release
August 1 2013
May 24 2011
Ranking
#881
#812