
Radeon HD 8690A vs Quadro FX 5600

Radeon HD 8690A
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8690A is positioned at rank 559 and the Quadro FX 5600 is on rank 407, so the Quadro FX 5600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8690A
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 5600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8690A.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8690A | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 5600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 5600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 206.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8690A | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+206.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8690A and Quadro FX 5600

Radeon HD 8690A
The Radeon HD 8690A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 514 points.

Quadro FX 5600
The Quadro FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8690A scores 514 and the Quadro FX 5600 reaches 525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8690A is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 5600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5600). Raw compute: 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5600).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 514 | 525+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 320+33% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.528 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS+18% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 20 | 80+300% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8690A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5600 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 5600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 5600) — the Quadro FX 5600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8690A draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 5600's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8690A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3+268% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8690A launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro FX 5600 launched at $2999 and now averages $50. The Quadro FX 5600 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.4 (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 10.5 (Quadro FX 5600) — the Quadro FX 5600 offers 208.8% better value. The Radeon HD 8690A is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Quadro FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-95% | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $50-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.4 | 10.5+209% |
| Codename | Sun | GT200B |
| Release | March 1 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #891 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















