Radeon HD 8690A vs Radeon R5 330
Radeon HD 8690A
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8690A is positioned at rank 559 and the Radeon R5 330 is on rank 435, so the Radeon R5 330 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8690A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 330
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 330 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8690A.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 330 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 330 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $150), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 239.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+239.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8690A and Radeon R5 330
Radeon HD 8690A
The Radeon HD 8690A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 514 points.
Radeon R5 330
The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8690A scores 514 and the Radeon R5 330 reaches 523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8690A is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 330 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 384 (Radeon R5 330). Raw compute: 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 514 | 523+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 384+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.528 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+49% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1024 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 20 | 24+20% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 96 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8690A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 330 has 2 GB. The Radeon R5 330 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_1 (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 330). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_1 | 12 (FL 11_1)+9% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8690A draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 330's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R5 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 350W (Radeon R5 330). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3 | 10.5+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8690A launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R5 330 launched at $81 and now averages $45. The Radeon R5 330 costs 70% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.4 (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 11.6 (Radeon R5 330) — the Radeon R5 330 offers 241.2% better value. The Radeon R5 330 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $81-46% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $45-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.4 | 11.6+241% |
| Codename | Sun | Weston |
| Release | March 1 2013 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #891 | #873 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8690A and Radeon R5 330
