
Quadro 600
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8690A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 600 is positioned at rank 249 and the Radeon HD 8690A is on rank 559, so the Quadro 600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8690A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8690A.
| Insight | Quadro 600 | Radeon HD 8690A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $150), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 661.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 600 | Radeon HD 8690A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+661.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 600 and Radeon HD 8690A

Quadro 600
The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

Radeon HD 8690A
The Radeon HD 8690A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 514 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 600 scores 522 and the Radeon HD 8690A reaches 514 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 600 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 8690A uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 600) vs 320 (Radeon HD 8690A). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600) vs 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8690A). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro 600 | Radeon HD 8690A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 522+2% | 514 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+20% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS+136% | 0.528 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz+96% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+20% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+80% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+669% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 600 | Radeon HD 8690A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 600 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8690A has 512 MB. The Quadro 600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro 600) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon HD 8690A) — the Quadro 600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 600 | Radeon HD 8690A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+669% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 600 draws 40W versus the Radeon HD 8690A's 50W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 600) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8690A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 600 | Radeon HD 8690A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-20% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1+27% | 10.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 600 launched at $179 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 8690A launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Quadro 600 costs 86.7% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.1 (Quadro 600) vs 3.4 (Radeon HD 8690A) — the Quadro 600 offers 667.6% better value. The Quadro 600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro 600 | Radeon HD 8690A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179 | $150-16% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-87% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.1+668% | 3.4 |
| Codename | GP107 | Sun |
| Release | February 7 2017 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #558 | #891 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













