Quadro 600 vs Radeon HD 8690A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon HD 8690A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon HD 8690A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 600

2017

Why buy it

✅59.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 40W instead of 50W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
19.3% HIGHER MSRP
$179 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8690A

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌25% higher power demand at 50W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 59.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (522 vs 514), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8690A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 17.5% (3.4 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8690A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 600 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 600 vs Radeon HD 8690A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 600

The Quadro 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $178.

Radeon HD 8690A

The Radeon HD 8690A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 514 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 600 scores 522 and the Radeon HD 8690A reaches 514 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 600 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 8690A uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 600) vs 320 (Radeon HD 8690A). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro 600) vs 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8690A). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon HD 8690A
G3D Mark Score	522+2%	514
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384+20%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS+136%	0.528 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1620 MHz+96%	825 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24+20%	20
L1 Cache	144 KB+80%	80 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon HD 8690A
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 600 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8690A carries 512 MB. Quadro 600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 600 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8690A. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro 600) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon HD 8690A) — the Quadro 600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon HD 8690A
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 600 draws 40W versus the Radeon HD 8690A's 50W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 600) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8690A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon HD 8690A
TDP	40W-20%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	13.1+27%	10.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 600 came in at $179, while the Radeon HD 8690A launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8690A was 16.2% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Quadro 600) vs 3.4 (Radeon HD 8690A) — the Radeon HD 8690A offers 17.2% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 600 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro 600	Radeon HD 8690A
MSRP	$179	$150-16%
Performance per Dollar	2.9	3.4+17%
Codename	GP107	Sun
Release	February 7 2017	March 1 2013
Ranking	#558	#891

Search Quadro 600 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8690A on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.