
Radeon HD 8690A

Radeon R5 M420
Radeon HD 8690A vs Radeon R5 M420 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 8690A vs Radeon R5 M420 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 8690A vs Radeon R5 M420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 8690A
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 104% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.4 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M420 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R5 M420
2016Why buy it
- ✅24.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8690A vs Radeon R5 M420 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 8690A
The Radeon HD 8690A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 514 points.

Radeon R5 M420
The Radeon R5 M420 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8690A scores 514 and the Radeon R5 M420 reaches 504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8690A is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M420 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 768 (Radeon R5 M420). Raw compute: 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M420). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 514+2% | 504 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 768+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.528 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS+191% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1000 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 20 | 48+140% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8690A and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M420. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 M420) — the Radeon R5 M420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_1 (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R5 M420). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_1 | 12 (11_1)+9% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 8690A) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M420). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8690A draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 M420's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8690A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M420). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3+54% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 8690A came in at $150, while the Radeon R5 M420 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8690A was 50% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.4 (Radeon HD 8690A) vs 1.7 (Radeon R5 M420) — the Radeon HD 8690A offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M420 (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8690A | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.4+100% | 1.7 |
| Codename | Sun | Emerald |
| Release | March 1 2013 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #891 | #649 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














