
Radeon HD 8730M
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 3800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8730M is positioned at rank 200 and the Quadro FX 3800 is on rank 347, so the Radeon HD 8730M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8730M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8730M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8730M | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 3800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8730M and Quadro FX 3800

Radeon HD 8730M
The Radeon HD 8730M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8730M scores 819 and the Quadro FX 3800 reaches 824 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8730M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 3800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8730M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3800). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8730M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 819 | 824 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+433% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.304 TFLOPS+270% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8730M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 8730M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8730M) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 3800) — the Radeon HD 8730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8730M) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1)+20% | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8730M) vs PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800). Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo HD.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8730M draws 100W versus the Quadro FX 3800's 189W — a 61.6% difference. The Radeon HD 8730M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8730M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3800). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-47% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.2+86% | 4.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8730M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $20 |
| Codename | Neptune | GT200B |
| Release | May 14 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #507 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















