
Radeon HD 8730M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 3850 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8730M is positioned at rank 200 and the Radeon HD 3850 X2 is on rank 303, so the Radeon HD 8730M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8730M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3850 X2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8730M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8730M | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 3850 X2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8730M and Radeon HD 3850 X2

Radeon HD 8730M
The Radeon HD 8730M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.

Radeon HD 3850 X2
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 822 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8730M scores 819 and the Radeon HD 3850 X2 reaches 822 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8730M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 3850 X2 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8730M) vs 960 (Radeon HD 3850 X2). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8730M) vs 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 819 | 822 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+33% | 960 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.304 TFLOPS+50% | 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8730M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3850 X2 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 8730M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8730M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3850 X2). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1)+19% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD+. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 8730M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD+ |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8730M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 3850 X2's 254W — a 87% difference. The Radeon HD 8730M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8730M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 3850 X2). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-61% | 254W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.2+156% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8730M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8730M | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $349 |
| Codename | Neptune | Barts |
| Release | May 14 2013 | September 19 2011 |
| Ranking | #507 | #630 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















