Radeon HD 8750M
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon HD 8750M vs GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon HD 8750M

2013Core: 670 MHzBoost: 775 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8750M is positioned at rank #144 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8750M

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
99%
#134
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
310%
#136
281%
#137
280%
#141
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
255%
#142
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
253%
#144
Radeon HD 8750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
100%
#147
GeForce GT 630M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
99%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
96%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
95%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8750M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 648% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8750M.

InsightRadeon HD 8750MGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-648%)
Leading raw performance (+648%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8750M and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon HD 8750M

The Radeon HD 8750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 26 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 670 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 8750M scores 1,052 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 648%. The Radeon HD 8750M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 8750M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.5146 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8750M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 8750MGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
1,052
7,869+648%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
384
896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5146 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+480%
Boost Clock
775 MHz
1665 MHz+115%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
56+133%
L1 Cache
96 KB
896 KB+833%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8750MGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8750M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8750M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8750MGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
128 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8750M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon HD 8750MGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8750M) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 8750M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureRadeon HD 8750MGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
UVD 3.0
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8750M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8750M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon HD 8750MGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
21.0
104.9+400%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 8750MGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$75
Codename
Mars
TU117
Release
February 26 2013
April 23 2019
Ranking
#869
#323