CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 8790M
Popular choices:
Tesla M2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8790M is positioned at rank 207 and the Tesla M2070 is on rank 387, so the Radeon HD 8790M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8790M
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8790M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2070.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8790M | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8790M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8790M and Tesla M2070
Radeon HD 8790M
The Radeon HD 8790M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points.
Tesla M2070
The Tesla M2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,305 points. Launch price was $3,099.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8790M scores 1,306 and the Tesla M2070 reaches 1,305 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8790M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla M2070 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 8790M) vs 448 (Tesla M2070). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8790M) vs 1.03 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8790M | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,306 | 1,305 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 448+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.03 TFLOPS+49% |
| ROPs | 8 | 48+500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 896 KB+833% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8790M | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8790M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 8790M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 8790M) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2070) — the Tesla M2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8790M | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8790M draws 50W versus the Tesla M2070's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8790M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8790M) vs 350W (Tesla M2070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8790M | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.1+350% | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8790M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8790M | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3099 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | Mars | GF100 |
| Release | April 1 2013 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #797 | #698 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8790M and Tesla M2070
