GeForce GTX 275
Radeon HD 8790M
GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon HD 8790M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon HD 8790M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon HD 8790M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 275
2009Why buy it
- ✅76.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 896 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 896 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌338% higher power demand at 219W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8790M
2013Why buy it
- ✅128.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 896 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 219W, a 169W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 275 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon HD 8790M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 275
The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.
Radeon HD 8790M
The Radeon HD 8790M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 275 scores 1,349 and the Radeon HD 8790M reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 275 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8790M uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8790M). Raw compute: 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8790M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,349+3% | 1,306 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6739 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS+3% |
| ROPs | 28+250% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 275 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8790M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 275 has 896 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8790M carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 8790M gives you 128.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 275 and System on the Radeon HD 8790M. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 275) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8790M) — the Radeon HD 8790M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.875 GB | 2 GB+129% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275) vs 11.1 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8790M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_0) | 11.1 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GTX 275) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8790M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 8790M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 275 draws 219W versus the Radeon HD 8790M's 50W — a 125.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8790M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 275) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8790M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 6.2 | 26.1+321% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon HD 8790M (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GT200B | Mars |
| Release | January 15 2009 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #789 | #797 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 275 and Radeon HD 8790M
