
GeForce GTX 275

GeForce GTX 460M SLI
GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 275
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅75% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (896 MB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2009 hardware with 896 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌192% higher power demand at 219W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 460M SLI
2010Why buy it
- ✅25.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 219W, a 144W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 896 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 275
The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI
The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,393 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 275 scores 1,349 and the GeForce GTX 460M SLI reaches 1,393 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 275 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 460M SLI uses Fermi, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,349 | 1,393+3% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 275 has 896 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460M SLI carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 275 gives you 75% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 275 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.875 GB+75% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M SLI). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_0) | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GTX 275) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 275 draws 219W versus the GeForce GTX 460M SLI's 75W — a 98% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 275) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 460M SLI). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 75W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.2 | 18.6+200% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 460M SLI (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GT200B | N11E-GS |
| Release | January 15 2009 | September 3 2010 |
| Ranking | #789 | #696 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















