GeForce GTX 275
VS
GeForce GTX 460M SLI

GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 275

2009Core: 633 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M SLI

2010Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 275 is positioned at rank 217 and the GeForce GTX 460M SLI is on rank 319, so the GeForce GTX 275 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 275

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1338%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1286%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1271%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1269%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1266%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1259%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1243%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1238%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1227%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1224%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1209%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1206%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1185%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1184%
#97
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
94%
#98
Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
91%
#202
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1476%
#217
GeForce GTX 275
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
100%
#219
Radeon HD 7400G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#220
Radeon HD 7480D
MSRP: $53|Avg: $30
98%
#221
Radeon HD 7520G
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
97%
#222
Radeon HD 8350G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#223
Radeon HD 6480G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#224
GeForce GT 415
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
94%
#225
Radeon HD 5550
MSRP: $75|Avg: $75
94%
#227
Radeon HD 6370D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#228
Radeon HD 7450
MSRP: $45|Avg: $12
92%
#229
Radeon HD 8470
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#230
Radeon HD 7540D
MSRP: $67|Avg: $5
91%
#232
Radeon HD 8240
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 460M SLI

#309
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
779%
#311
707%
#312
705%
#316
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
641%
#317
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
636%
#319
GeForce GTX 460M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#320
GeForce 940A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
99%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
98%
#326
Iris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
97%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
97%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
92%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
92%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
91%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 275 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 460M SLI
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%)
Leading raw performance (+3.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+75%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 460M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 275 and GeForce GTX 460M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 275

The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M SLI

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,393 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 275 scores 1,349 and the GeForce GTX 460M SLI reaches 1,393 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 275 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 460M SLI uses Fermi, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 460M SLI
G3D Mark Score
1,349
1,393+3%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Fermi
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
384+60%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 460M SLI
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 275 comes with 896 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460M SLI has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 275 offers 75% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 460M SLI
VRAM Capacity
0.875 GB+75%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M SLI). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 460M SLI
DirectX
11 (10_0)
12 (11_0)+9%
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GTX 275) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 460M SLI
Encoder
No
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 275 draws 219W versus the GeForce GTX 460M SLI's 75W — a 98% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 275) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 460M SLI). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 460M SLI
TDP
219W
75W-66%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
267mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
6.2
18.6+200%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 460M SLI
MSRP
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$249
Codename
GT200B
N11E-GS
Release
January 15 2009
September 3 2010
Ranking
#789
#696