Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 275

2009Core: 633 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

2020Boost: 2100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 275
0.875 GB 219
1,349
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 730A
brand logoGeForce 920A
brand logoGeForce 930M
brand logoGeForce GTX 260
brand logoGeForce GTX 770
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
Shared System RAM 15
1,410
+4.5%
brand logoRadeon HD 7730M
brand logoRadeon HD 8570
brand logoRadeon R7 430
brand logoRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
brand logoRadeon R9 380
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 275
low31 FPS
medium25 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
low63 FPS
medium51 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra32 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 275
low59 FPS
medium37 FPS
high28 FPS
ultra19 FPS
1080P
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
low63 FPS
medium51 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra32 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 275
low61 FPS
medium49 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra30 FPS
1080P
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
low63 FPS
medium51 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra32 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 275
low61 FPS
medium46 FPS
high32 FPS
ultra26 FPS
1080P
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
low63 FPS
medium51 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra32 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 275
low60 FPS
medium49 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra30 FPS
1080P
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
low60 FPS
medium51 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra32 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 275
low9 FPS
medium5 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra3 FPS
1080P
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
low63 FPS
medium51 FPS
high38 FPS
ultra24 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 275
low45 FPS
medium34 FPS
high28 FPS
ultra19 FPS
1080P
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
low62 FPS
medium47 FPS
high39 FPS
ultra22 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 275
low51 FPS
medium35 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra21 FPS
1080P
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
low51 FPS
medium36 FPS
high28 FPS
ultra22 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 275
low61 FPS
medium49 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra30 FPS
1080P
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
low63 FPS
medium51 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra32 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 275
low46 FPS
medium34 FPS
high28 FPS
ultra23 FPS
1080P
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
low63 FPS
medium51 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra32 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 275

2009

Why buy it

  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (896 MB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2009 hardware with 896 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    151.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $249 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 14.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • ❌1360% higher power demand at 219W vs 15W.

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅36.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 162.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.2 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 219W, a 204W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 896 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.5% in PassMark G3D (1,410 vs 1,349), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 275 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 896 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 162.9% (14.2 vs 5.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 275 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 275

The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,410 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 275 scores 1,349 and the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C reaches 1,410 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 275 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C uses Vega, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 512 (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C).

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
G3D Mark Score
1,349
1,410+5%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Vega
Process Node
55 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
240
512+113%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 275 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 275 has 896 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 275 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 275 and System on the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
VRAM Capacity
0.875 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275) vs 12_1 (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
DirectX
11 (10_0)
12_1+9%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GTX 275) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs VCN 1.0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
Encoder
No
VCN 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
VCN 1.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 275 draws 219W versus the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C's 15W — a 174.4% difference. The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 275) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
TDP
219W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
550W
1W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
267mm
1mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
—
Perf/Watt
6.2
94.0+1416%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 275 came in at $249, while the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C was 60.2% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 14.2 (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C) — the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C offers 163% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C (2020 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP
$249
$99-60%
Performance per Dollar
5.4
14.2+163%
Codename
GT200B
Vega
Release
January 15 2009
January 7 2020
Ranking
#789
#545
Search GeForce GTX 275 on AmazonSearch Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.