GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GT 750M
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 275
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 750M is positioned at rank 158 and the GeForce GTX 275 is on rank 217, so the GeForce GT 750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 275
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 275 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 750M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+128.6%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $249), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 391.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+391.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GT 750M
The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.
GeForce GTX 275
The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 750M scores 1,332 and the GeForce GTX 275 reaches 1,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 275 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 275). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M) vs 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,332 | 1,349+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7427 TFLOPS+10% | 0.6739 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 28+75% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+14% | 224 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 750M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 275 has 896 MB. The GeForce GT 750M offers 128.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 750M) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 275) — the GeForce GT 750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+129% | 0.875 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+14% | 224 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11) (GeForce GT 750M) vs 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11)+9% | 11 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GT 750M) vs No (GeForce GTX 275). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | No |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 750M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 275's 219W — a 125.7% difference. The GeForce GT 750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 275). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.6+329% | 6.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 750M costs 79.9% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.6 (GeForce GT 750M) vs 5.4 (GeForce GTX 275) — the GeForce GT 750M offers 392.6% better value. The GeForce GT 750M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-80% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6+393% | 5.4 |
| Codename | GK107 | GT200B |
| Release | January 9 2013 | January 15 2009 |
| Ranking | #792 | #789 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 275
