GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 275

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 750M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 275

2009Core: 633 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 275 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 750M

2013

Why buy it

  • 128.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 896 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 219W, a 169W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 275 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 275

2009

Why buy it

  • 86.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 896 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2009 hardware with 896 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 338% higher power demand at 219W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 275 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 86.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,349 vs 1,332), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 750M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 896 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 275 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 275 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 750M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 750M

The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 275

The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 750M scores 1,332 and the GeForce GTX 275 reaches 1,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 275 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 275). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M) vs 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275).

FeatureGeForce GT 750MGeForce GTX 275
G3D Mark Score
1,332
1,349+1%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS+10%
0.6739 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
28+75%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB+14%
224 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 750MGeForce GTX 275
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 275 carries 896 MB. GeForce GT 750M gives you 128.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 750M and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 275. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 750M) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 275) — the GeForce GT 750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 750MGeForce GTX 275
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+129%
0.875 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+14%
224 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11) (GeForce GT 750M) vs 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 750MGeForce GTX 275
DirectX
12 (FL11)+9%
11 (10_0)
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GT 750M) vs No (GeForce GTX 275). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275).

FeatureGeForce GT 750MGeForce GTX 275
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
No
Decoder
NVDEC 1st gen
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 750M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 275's 219W — a 125.7% difference. The GeForce GT 750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 275). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 750MGeForce GTX 275
TDP
50W-77%
219W
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
26.6+329%
6.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 750M (2013 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GT 750MGeForce GTX 275
MSRP
$249
Codename
GK107
GT200B
Release
January 9 2013
January 15 2009
Ranking
#792
#789

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.