GeForce GT 750M vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 750M

50

1,332

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

Iris Plus Graphics 640

15

1,353

+1.6%

Arc Graphics 130T

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 750M is positioned at rank #158 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

98%

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

96%

#148

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

326%

#150

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

296%

#151

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

295%

#155

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

268%

#156

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

266%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

100%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

100%

#172

GeForce GT 540M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 750M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 750M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 640 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 750M Benchmark Check

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 750M and Iris Plus Graphics 640

GeForce GT 750M

The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 640

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 750M scores 1,332 and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 reaches 1,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
G3D Mark Score	1,332	1,353+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 9.5
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm++
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7427 TFLOPS	0.8448 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock	967 MHz	1100 MHz+14%
ROPs	16+167%	6
TMUs	32	48+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 750M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 750M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 750M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11) (GeForce GT 750M) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
DirectX	12 (FL11)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GT 750M) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640).

Feature	GeForce GT 750M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	Quick Sync Video
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	Quick Sync Video
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 750M draws 50W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 640's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M) vs 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
TDP	50W	15W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	0W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	80
Perf/Watt	26.6	90.2+239%

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.6 (GeForce GT 750M) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) — the Iris Plus Graphics 640 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).