GeForce GT 750M
VS
Quadro K2100M

GeForce GT 750M vs Quadro K2100M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 750M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K2100M

2013Core: 667 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 750M is positioned at rank 158 and the Quadro K2100M is on rank 108, so the Quadro K2100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#148
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
326%
#150
296%
#151
295%
#155
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
268%
#156
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
266%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
100%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
100%
#172
GeForce GT 540M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2100M

#57
Quadro RTX 3000
MSRP: $800|Avg: $891
99%
#58
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700
97%
#59
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
93%
#60
Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP: $999|Avg: $350
92%
#62
RTX A4500
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800
91%
#63
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000
90%
#93
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1078%
#108
Quadro K2100M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#111
Quadro P520
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#113
Radeon Pro WX 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
95%
#117
Radeon Pro 580X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
92%
#118
Radeon Pro WX 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $45
92%
#119
CMP 40HX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $120
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K2100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 750M.

InsightGeForce GT 750MQuadro K2100M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K2100M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 750M and Quadro K2100M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 750M

The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2100M

The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 750M scores 1,332 and the Quadro K2100M reaches 1,370 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M is built on Kepler while the Quadro K2100M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M) vs 576 (Quadro K2100M). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M) vs 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M).

FeatureGeForce GT 750MQuadro K2100M
G3D Mark Score
1,332
1,370+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
576+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS
0.7684 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
48+50%
L1 Cache
32 KB
48 KB+50%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 750MQuadro K2100M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 750MQuadro K2100M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11) (GeForce GT 750M) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2100M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GT 750MQuadro K2100M
DirectX
12 (FL11)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GT 750M) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K2100M). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K2100M).

FeatureGeForce GT 750MQuadro K2100M
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
1st Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC 1st gen
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 750M draws 50W versus the Quadro K2100M's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M) vs 350W (Quadro K2100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 750MQuadro K2100M
TDP
50W-9%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
26.6+7%
24.9