Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro M40003 vs GeForce GT 750M

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro M40003

2012Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 750M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro M40003 vs GeForce GT 750M Performance Spectrum

FirePro M40003
4 GB 33
1,364
+2.4%
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 5850
brand logoRadeon 6750M
brand logoRadeon R7 M465
brand logoRadeon R9 M270X
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6600
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce GT 750M
2 GB 50
1,332
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 730A
brand logoGeForce 920A
brand logoGeForce 930M
brand logoGeForce 830A
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M40003 vs GeForce GT 750M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M40003

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GT 750M

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • ❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M40003 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (1,364 vs 1,332), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M40003 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M40003 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro M40003 vs GeForce GT 750M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M40003

The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 750M

The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the GeForce GT 750M reaches 1,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 750M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 384 (GeForce GT 750M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M).

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GT 750M
G3D Mark Score
1,364+2%
1,332
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
0.7427 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
128 KB+300%
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 750M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M40003 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GT 750M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M40003 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 750M carries 2 GB. FirePro M40003 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M40003 and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 750M.

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GT 750M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M40003) vs 12 (FL11) (GeForce GT 750M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GT 750M
DirectX
12
12 (FL11)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GT 750M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M).

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GT 750M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 1st gen
Decoder
UVD 4.0
NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 750M's 50W — a 41% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 350W (GeForce GT 750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 82mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GT 750M
TDP
33W-34%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
82mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
41.3+55%
26.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 750M (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GT 750M
MSRP
$150
—
Codename
Chelsea
GK107
Release
June 27 2012
January 9 2013
Ranking
#752
#792
Search FirePro M40003 on AmazonSearch GeForce GT 750M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.