Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 275 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 275

2009Core: 633 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 275 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 275
0.875 GB 219
1,349
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 730A
brand logoGeForce 920A
brand logoGeForce 930M
brand logoGeForce GTX 260
brand logoGeForce GTX 770
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Shared System RAM 15
1,353
+0.3%
brand logoArc Graphics 130T
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 275 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 275

2009

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (896 MB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Plus Graphics 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 275 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2009 hardware with 896 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌1360% higher power demand at 219W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 219W, a 204W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 896 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (1,353 vs 1,349), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 275 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 896 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 275 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Plus Graphics 640 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 275 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 275

The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 275 scores 1,349 and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 reaches 1,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 275 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses Generation 9.5, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Raw compute: 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640).

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Iris Plus Graphics 640
G3D Mark Score
1,349
1,353
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Generation 9.5
Process Node
55 nm
14 nm++
Shading Units
240
384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6739 TFLOPS
0.8448 TFLOPS+25%
ROPs
28+367%
6
TMUs
80+67%
48
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 275 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Iris Plus Graphics 640
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 275 has 896 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 275 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 275 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 640.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Iris Plus Graphics 640
VRAM Capacity
0.875 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Iris Plus Graphics 640
DirectX
11 (10_0)
12 (12_1)+9%
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GTX 275) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640).

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Iris Plus Graphics 640
Encoder
No
Quick Sync Video
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
Quick Sync Video
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 275 draws 219W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 640's 15W — a 174.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 275) vs 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Iris Plus Graphics 640
TDP
219W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
550W
0W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
None
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
—
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80
Perf/Watt
6.2
90.2+1355%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 275 came in at $249, while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 640 was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (GeForce GTX 275) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) — the Iris Plus Graphics 640 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 640 (2017 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 275Iris Plus Graphics 640
MSRP
$249
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
5.4
Infinity
Codename
GT200B
Kaby Lake GT3e
Release
January 15 2009
January 3 2017
Ranking
#789
#767
Search GeForce GTX 275 on AmazonSearch Iris Plus Graphics 640 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.