RADEON HD6530D vs Radeon R5 M255

AMD

RADEON HD6530D

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M255

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

RADEON HD6530D vs Radeon R5 M255 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON HD6530D vs Radeon R5 M255 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON HD6530D vs Radeon R5 M255: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON HD6530D

2011

Why buy it

  • 45.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 193.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 148% higher power demand at 186W vs 75W.

Radeon R5 M255

2014

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 186W, a 111W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RADEON HD6530D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON HD6530D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 M255 instead at 543 vs 532, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON HD6530D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON HD6530D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 193.9% (10.6 vs 3.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RADEON HD6530D vs Radeon R5 M255 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON HD6530D

The RADEON HD6530D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Radeon R5 M255

The Radeon R5 M255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $799.99.

Graphics Performance

The RADEON HD6530D scores 532 and the Radeon R5 M255 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON HD6530D is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R5 M255 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (RADEON HD6530D) vs 640 (Radeon R5 M255). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6530D) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M255).

FeatureRADEON HD6530DRadeon R5 M255
G3D Mark Score
532
543+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+100%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.92 TFLOPS+62%
1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+100%
40
L1 Cache
320 KB+100%
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON HD6530DRadeon R5 M255
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON HD6530D has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M255 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M255 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RADEON HD6530D and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M255. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON HD6530D) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 M255) — the RADEON HD6530D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON HD6530DRadeon R5 M255
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (RADEON HD6530D) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M255). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureRADEON HD6530DRadeon R5 M255
DirectX
11.2
12+7%
Max Displays
0
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3.0 (RADEON HD6530D) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R5 M255). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureRADEON HD6530DRadeon R5 M255
Encoder
UVD 3.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 3.0
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON HD6530D draws 186W versus the Radeon R5 M255's 75W — a 85.1% difference. The Radeon R5 M255 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6530D) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M255). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.

FeatureRADEON HD6530DRadeon R5 M255
TDP
186W
75W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
2.9
7.2+148%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON HD6530D came in at $50, while the Radeon R5 M255 launched at $150. On MSRP, RADEON HD6530D was 66.7% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (RADEON HD6530D) vs 3.6 (Radeon R5 M255) — the RADEON HD6530D offers 194.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M255 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureRADEON HD6530DRadeon R5 M255
MSRP
$50-67%
$150
Performance per Dollar
10.6+194%
3.6
Codename
Cayman
Venus
Release
December 1 2011
January 28 2014
Ranking
#598
#851

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.