
RADEON HD6530D

Radeon R5 M255
RADEON HD6530D vs Radeon R5 M255 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON HD6530D vs Radeon R5 M255 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON HD6530D vs Radeon R5 M255: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON HD6530D
2011Why buy it
- ✅45.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 193.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌148% higher power demand at 186W vs 75W.
Radeon R5 M255
2014Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 186W, a 111W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RADEON HD6530D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON HD6530D vs Radeon R5 M255 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON HD6530D
The RADEON HD6530D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 532 points. Launch price was $180.

Radeon R5 M255
The Radeon R5 M255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $799.99.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON HD6530D scores 532 and the Radeon R5 M255 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON HD6530D is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R5 M255 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (RADEON HD6530D) vs 640 (Radeon R5 M255). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6530D) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M255).
| Feature | RADEON HD6530D | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 532 | 543+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS+62% | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON HD6530D | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON HD6530D has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M255 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M255 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RADEON HD6530D and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M255. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON HD6530D) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 M255) — the RADEON HD6530D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON HD6530D | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (RADEON HD6530D) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M255). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | RADEON HD6530D | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3.0 (RADEON HD6530D) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R5 M255). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | RADEON HD6530D | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON HD6530D draws 186W versus the Radeon R5 M255's 75W — a 85.1% difference. The Radeon R5 M255 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6530D) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M255). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.
| Feature | RADEON HD6530D | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 75W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.9 | 7.2+148% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RADEON HD6530D came in at $50, while the Radeon R5 M255 launched at $150. On MSRP, RADEON HD6530D was 66.7% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (RADEON HD6530D) vs 3.6 (Radeon R5 M255) — the RADEON HD6530D offers 194.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M255 (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | RADEON HD6530D | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-67% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6+194% | 3.6 |
| Codename | Cayman | Venus |
| Release | December 1 2011 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #598 | #851 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














