
Radeon Pro 455 vs Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

Radeon Pro 455
Popular choices:

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 455 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 455 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 455 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 455 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 455 and Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

Radeon Pro 455
The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,035 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 455 scores 3,113 and the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU reaches 3,035 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,113+3% | 3,035 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 455 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro 455 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 455) vs 12.1 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 455) vs VPU (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VPU.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VPU |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VPU |
| Codecs | — | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 455 draws 35W versus the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU's 7W — a 133.3% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 455) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 7W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.9 | 433.6+388% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 455 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.8 (Radeon Pro 455) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | Baffin | — |
| Release | October 30 2016 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #577 | #916 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















