Radeon Pro 455
VS
Radeon HD 7790

Radeon Pro 455 vs Radeon HD 7790

AMD

Radeon Pro 455

2016Core: 855 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7790

2013Core: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 455 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7790.

InsightRadeon Pro 455Radeon HD 7790
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon Pro 455 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 455 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Pro 455Radeon HD 7790
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+0.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 455 and Radeon HD 7790

AMD

Radeon Pro 455

The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7790

The Radeon HD 7790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 22 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,090 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 455 scores 3,113 and the Radeon HD 7790 reaches 3,090 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 455 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 7790 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 455) vs 896 (Radeon HD 7790). Raw compute: 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7790).

FeatureRadeon Pro 455Radeon HD 7790
G3D Mark Score
3,113
3,090
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
896+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.313 TFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS+36%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48
56+17%
L1 Cache
192 KB
224 KB+17%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 455Radeon HD 7790
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 455) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7790) — the Radeon Pro 455 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 455Radeon HD 7790
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 455) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon HD 7790). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 5.

FeatureRadeon Pro 455Radeon HD 7790
DirectX
12_0
12 (12_0)
Max Displays
0
5
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 455) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 7790). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureRadeon Pro 455Radeon HD 7790
Encoder
VCE 3.4
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 455 draws 35W versus the Radeon HD 7790's 85W — a 83.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 455 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 455) vs 400W (Radeon HD 7790). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 183mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon Pro 455Radeon HD 7790
TDP
35W-59%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
183mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
88.9+144%
36.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 455 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 7790 launched at $149 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.8 (Radeon Pro 455) vs 77.3 (Radeon HD 7790) — the Radeon Pro 455 offers 0.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 455 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon Pro 455Radeon HD 7790
MSRP
$0-100%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$40
Performance per Dollar
77.8
77.3
Codename
Baffin
Bonaire
Release
October 30 2016
March 22 2013
Ranking
#577
#579