Radeon Pro 455 vs Tesla C2070
Radeon Pro 455
Popular choices:
Tesla C2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 455.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (248mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $38 (vs $40), it costs 5% less, resulting in a 5.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($38) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 455 and Tesla C2070
Radeon Pro 455
The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.
Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 455 scores 3,113 and the Tesla C2070 reaches 3,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 455 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 455) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,113 | 3,121 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+71% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.313 TFLOPS+28% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 896 KB+367% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 455 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 has 6 GB. The Tesla C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 455) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) — the Radeon Pro 455 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 455) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 455 draws 35W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 148.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 455 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 455) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 248mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-85% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 248mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.9+579% | 13.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 455 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499 and now averages $38. The Tesla C2070 costs 5% less ($2 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.8 (Radeon Pro 455) vs 82.1 (Tesla C2070) — the Tesla C2070 offers 5.5% better value. The Radeon Pro 455 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $38-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.8 | 82.1+6% |
| Codename | Baffin | GF100 |
| Release | October 30 2016 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #577 | #575 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 455 and Tesla C2070
