GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon Pro 455

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon Pro 455 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon Pro 455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 860M

2014

Why buy it

✅0.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 455

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 860M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 860M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro 455 instead at 3,113 vs 3,095, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 860M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 455 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 455 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 860M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon Pro 455 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 860M

The GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1152 or 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,095 points.

Radeon Pro 455

The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 860M scores 3,095 and the Radeon Pro 455 reaches 3,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 860M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro 455 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 455). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455).

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	Radeon Pro 455
G3D Mark Score	3,095	3,113
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1152 or 640+50%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS+6%	1.313 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	48+20%
L1 Cache	320 KB+67%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 860M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 455 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	Radeon Pro 455
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 860M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 455. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 455) — the GeForce GTX 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	Radeon Pro 455
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 455). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	Radeon Pro 455
DirectX	11.0	12_0+9%
Max Displays	1	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 455). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	Radeon Pro 455
Encoder	NVENC 2.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 860M draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 455's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 455 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 455). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	Radeon Pro 455
TDP	75W	35W-53%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	41.3	88.9+115%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 455 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	Radeon Pro 455
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GM107	Baffin
Release	January 13 2014	October 30 2016
Ranking	#578	#577

Search GeForce GTX 860M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 455 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.