GeForce GTX 860M vs GRID P4-2Q
GeForce GTX 860M
Popular choices:
GRID P4-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 860M is positioned at rank 177 and the GRID P4-2Q is on rank 285, so the GeForce GTX 860M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 860M
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 860M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 860M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 860M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 860M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $235), it costs 79% less, resulting in a 360% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 860M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+360%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($235) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 860M and GRID P4-2Q
GeForce GTX 860M
The GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1152 or 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,095 points.
GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 860M scores 3,095 and the GRID P4-2Q reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 860M is built on Maxwell while the GRID P4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,095 | 3,162+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 or 640 | 2048+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.389 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+247% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1178 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 860M draws 75W versus the GRID P4-2Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 350W (GRID P4-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 41.3+193% | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 860M costs 78.7% less ($185 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.9 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 13.5 (GRID P4-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 860M offers 358.5% better value. The GRID P4-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-79% | $235 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.9+359% | 13.5 |
| Codename | GM107 | GM204 |
| Release | January 13 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #578 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 860M and GRID P4-2Q
