GeForce GTX 860M vs GRID P4-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 860M vs GRID P4-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 860M vs GRID P4-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 860M

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).

GRID P4-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P4-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (3,162 vs 3,095), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 860M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P4-2Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P4-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 860M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 860M vs GRID P4-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 860M

The GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1152 or 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,095 points.

GRID P4-2Q

The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 860M scores 3,095 and the GRID P4-2Q reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 860M is built on Maxwell while the GRID P4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	GRID P4-2Q
G3D Mark Score	3,095	3,162+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1152 or 640	2048+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+247%
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	1178 MHz+9%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	128+220%
L1 Cache	320 KB	768 KB+140%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 860M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P4-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	GRID P4-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 860M and 64-bit on the GRID P4-2Q.

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	GRID P4-2Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 860M draws 75W versus the GRID P4-2Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 350W (GRID P4-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	GRID P4-2Q
TDP	75W-67%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	41.3+193%	14.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID P4-2Q (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 860M	GRID P4-2Q
MSRP	—	$1500
Codename	GM107	GM204
Release	January 13 2014	August 30 2015
Ranking	#578	#433

Search GeForce GTX 860M on Amazon

Search GRID P4-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.