GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce GTX 860M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce GTX 860M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce GTX 860M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011

Why buy it

✅40.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 860M

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 40.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 860M instead at 3,095 vs 3,080, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce GTX 860M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce GTX 860M

The GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1152 or 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,095 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the GeForce GTX 860M reaches 3,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 860M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 860M). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 860M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	GeForce GTX 860M
G3D Mark Score	3,080	3,095
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1152 or 640+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.263 TFLOPS	1.389 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	512 KB+60%	320 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	GeForce GTX 860M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 860M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 860M) — the GeForce GTX 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	GeForce GTX 860M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 860M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	GeForce GTX 860M
DirectX	11_0	11.0
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 860M). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 860M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	GeForce GTX 860M
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the GeForce GTX 860M's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 860M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	GeForce GTX 860M
TDP	160W	75W-53%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	19.3	41.3+114%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 860M (2014 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	GeForce GTX 860M
MSRP	$249	—
Codename	GF114	GM107
Release	January 25 2011	January 13 2014
Ranking	#580	#578

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 860M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.