GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011Core: 823 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…150.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    151.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $249 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • ❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
  • ❌38.8% longer card at 229mm vs 165mm.

Radeon R9 360

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $150 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 147.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
  • βœ…Measures 165mm instead of 229mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 150.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (3,080 vs 3,032), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 360 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 147.6% (30.6 vs 12.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 360 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 560 Ti has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon R9 360

The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the Radeon R9 360 reaches 3,032 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon R9 360). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
G3D Mark Score
3,080+2%
3,032
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.263 TFLOPS+33%
0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 360 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 360. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 360) β€” the GeForce GTX 560 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
DirectX
11_0
12 (12_0)+9%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 360). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 360).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 360's 30W β€” a 136.8% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 360). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
TDP
160W
30W-81%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
165mm
Height
β€”
110mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
β€”
75
Perf/Watt
19.3
101.1+424%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti came in at $249, while the Radeon R9 360 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R9 360 was 60.2% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 30.6 (Radeon R9 360) β€” the Radeon R9 360 offers 146.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 360 (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
MSRP
$249
$99-60%
Performance per Dollar
12.4
30.6+147%
Codename
GF114
Tropo
Release
January 25 2011
May 5 2015
Ranking
#580
#711

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.