
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon R9 360
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
2011Why buy it
- β 150.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- β2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β151.5% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- β433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
- β38.8% longer card at 229mm vs 165mm.
Radeon R9 360
2015Why buy it
- β Costs $150 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- β Delivers 147.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
- β Measures 165mm instead of 229mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon R9 360
The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the Radeon R9 360 reaches 3,032 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon R9 360). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,080+2% | 3,032 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.263 TFLOPS+33% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 360 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 360. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 360) β the GeForce GTX 560 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (12_0)+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 360). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 360).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 360's 30W β a 136.8% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 360). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 30W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 165mm |
| Height | β | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | β | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 19.3 | 101.1+424% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti came in at $249, while the Radeon R9 360 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R9 360 was 60.2% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 30.6 (Radeon R9 360) β the Radeon R9 360 offers 146.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 360 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $99-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 30.6+147% |
| Codename | GF114 | Tropo |
| Release | January 25 2011 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #580 | #711 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














