GeForce GTX 560 Ti
VS
Radeon R9 360

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011Core: 823 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 360

#169
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
354%
#171
321%
#172
320%
#176
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
291%
#177
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
289%
#179
Radeon R9 360
MSRP: $99|Avg: $55
100%
#180
100%
#181
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
99%
#182
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
#183
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 360.

InsightGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $55), it costs 9% less, resulting in a 11.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+11.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Radeon R9 360

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon R9 360

The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the Radeon R9 360 reaches 3,032 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon R9 360). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
G3D Mark Score
3,080+2%
3,032
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.263 TFLOPS+33%
0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 360) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
DirectX
11_0
12 (12_0)+9%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 360). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 360).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 360's 30W — a 136.8% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 360). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
TDP
160W
30W-81%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
165mm
Height
110mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
19.3
101.1+424%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 360 launched at $99 and now averages $55. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti costs 9.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.6 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 55.1 (Radeon R9 360) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti offers 11.8% better value. The Radeon R9 360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon R9 360
MSRP
$249
$99-60%
Avg Price (30d)
$50-9%
$55
Performance per Dollar
61.6+12%
55.1
Codename
GF114
Tropo
Release
January 25 2011
May 5 2015
Ranking
#580
#711