
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon R9 360

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 360
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 360.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $55), it costs 9% less, resulting in a 11.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+11.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Radeon R9 360

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon R9 360
The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the Radeon R9 360 reaches 3,032 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon R9 360). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,080+2% | 3,032 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.263 TFLOPS+33% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 360) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (12_0)+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 360). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 360).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 360's 30W — a 136.8% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 360). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 30W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 165mm |
| Height | — | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 19.3 | 101.1+424% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 360 launched at $99 and now averages $55. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti costs 9.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.6 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 55.1 (Radeon R9 360) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti offers 11.8% better value. The Radeon R9 360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $99-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-9% | $55 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.6+12% | 55.1 |
| Codename | GF114 | Tropo |
| Release | January 25 2011 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #580 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















