GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011Core: 823 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

2018
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 2185.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 7W.

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 7W instead of 160W, a 153W reduction.
  • More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (3,080 vs 3,035), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,035 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU reaches 3,035 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
G3D Mark Score
3,080+1%
3,035
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 560 Ti gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and System on the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 12.1 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
DirectX
11_0
12.1+10%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs VPU (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs VPU. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
VPU
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
VPU
Codecs
H.264
AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU's 7W — a 183.2% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
TDP
160W
7W-96%
Recommended PSU
500W
1W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
229mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
19.3
433.6+2147%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti came in at $249, while the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU launched at $0. On MSRP, Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU (2018 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiQualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
MSRP
$249
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
12.4
Infinity
Codename
GF114
Release
January 25 2011
December 6 2018
Ranking
#580
#916

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.