GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Tesla K40m

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Tesla K40m FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Tesla K40m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 245W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K40m

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌53.1% higher power demand at 245W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K40m is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (3,143 vs 3,080), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Tesla K40m still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Tesla K40m Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

Tesla K40m

The Tesla K40m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,143 points. Launch price was $7,699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the Tesla K40m reaches 3,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Tesla K40m uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40m). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40m).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Tesla K40m
G3D Mark Score	3,080	3,143+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2880+650%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.263 TFLOPS	5.046 TFLOPS+300%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	64	240+275%
L1 Cache	512 KB+113%	240 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla K40m leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Tesla K40m
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and 64-bit on the Tesla K40m. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40m) — the Tesla K40m has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Tesla K40m
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the Tesla K40m's 245W — a 42% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 350W (Tesla K40m). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Tesla K40m
TDP	160W-35%	245W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	19.3+51%	12.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Tesla K40m (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Tesla K40m
MSRP	$249	—
Codename	GF114	GK110B
Release	January 25 2011	November 22 2013
Ranking	#580	#573

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti on Amazon

Search Tesla K40m on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.