GeForce GTX 560 Ti
VS
Radeon 740M

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon 740M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011Core: 823 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 740M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 740M

#327
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
891%
#329
808%
#330
806%
#334
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
733%
#335
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
728%
#337
Radeon 740M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
99%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
93%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
92%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
91%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 740M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2011). The Radeon 740M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 740M.

InsightGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon 740M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Radeon 740M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon 740M

The Radeon 740M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 4 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,045 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the Radeon 740M reaches 3,045 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon 740M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 256 (Radeon 740M). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon 740M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon 740M
G3D Mark Score
3,080+1%
3,045
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384+50%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.263 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS+127%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
64+300%
16
L1 Cache
512 KB+700%
64 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon 740M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon 740M) — the Radeon 740M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon 740M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon 740M's 45W — a 112.2% difference. The Radeon 740M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 740M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon 740M
TDP
160W
45W-72%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
None
Length
229mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
19.3
67.7+251%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 740M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 TiRadeon 740M
MSRP
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Codename
GF114
Phoenix2
Release
January 25 2011
January 31 2024
Ranking
#580
#581