GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon 740M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon 740M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon 740M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011

Why buy it

✅49.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌255.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 45W.

Radeon 740M

2024

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 45W instead of 160W, a 115W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 49.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (3,080 vs 3,045), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 740M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 4 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 740M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon 740M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon 740M

The Radeon 740M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 4 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,045 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the Radeon 740M reaches 3,045 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon 740M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 256 (Radeon 740M). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon 740M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Radeon 740M
G3D Mark Score	3,080+1%	3,045
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	40 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384+50%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.263 TFLOPS	2.867 TFLOPS+127%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	64+300%	16
L1 Cache	512 KB+700%	64 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 740M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Radeon 740M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and System on the Radeon 740M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon 740M) — the Radeon 740M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Radeon 740M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	256-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon 740M's 45W — a 112.2% difference. The Radeon 740M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 740M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Radeon 740M
TDP	160W	45W-72%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	229mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	19.3	67.7+251%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 740M (2024 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Radeon 740M
MSRP	$249	—
Codename	GF114	Phoenix2
Release	January 25 2011	January 31 2024
Ranking	#580	#581

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon 740M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.