GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon Pro 555

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon Pro 555 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon Pro 555: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011

Why buy it

✅38.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 555

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro 555 instead at 3,141 vs 3,080, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon Pro 555 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon Pro 555

The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the Radeon Pro 555 reaches 3,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 555 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Radeon Pro 555
G3D Mark Score	3,080	3,141+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.263 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	512 KB+167%	192 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 555 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Radeon Pro 555
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 555. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon Pro 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Radeon Pro 555
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro 555's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Radeon Pro 555
TDP	160W	75W-53%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	19.3	41.9+117%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti came in at $249, while the Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 555 was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 555 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Radeon Pro 555
MSRP	$249	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	12.4	Infinity
Codename	GF114	Polaris 21
Release	January 25 2011	June 5 2017
Ranking	#580	#574

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 555 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.