FirePro V7000
VS
GeForce GTX 860M

FirePro V7000 vs GeForce GTX 860M

FirePro V7000

2012Core: 950 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 860M

2014Core: 797 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V7000 is positioned at rank 243 and the GeForce GTX 860M is on rank 177, so the GeForce GTX 860M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7000

#102
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500
91%
#103
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
84%
#104
Radeon Pro W6900X
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000
82%
#105
Quadro RTX 6000
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800
81%
#228
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
4197%
#243
FirePro V7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $100
100%
#244
Quadro P500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
94%
#246
FireStream 9370
MSRP: $800|Avg: $50
90%
#247
GRID K260Q
MSRP: $937|Avg: $15
89%
#249
Quadro 600
MSRP: $179|Avg: $20
83%
#251
Quadro 410
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
82%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
80%
#254
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
78%
#255
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
78%
#256
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
78%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
76%
#258
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 860M

#167
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
351%
#169
318%
#170
317%
#174
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
288%
#175
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
286%
#177
GeForce GTX 860M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
100%
#179
Radeon R9 360
MSRP: $99|Avg: $55
99%
#180
99%
#181
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
98%
#182
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
98%
#183
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
97%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro V7000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 860M.

InsightFirePro V7000GeForce GTX 860M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 860M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 860M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 95.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro V7000GeForce GTX 860M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+95.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V7000 and GeForce GTX 860M

AMD

FirePro V7000

The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 860M

The GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1152 or 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,095 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V7000 scores 3,162 and the GeForce GTX 860M reaches 3,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 860M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7000) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 860M). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 860M).

FeatureFirePro V7000GeForce GTX 860M
G3D Mark Score
3,162+2%
3,095
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+11%
1152 or 640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS+75%
1.389 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+100%
40
L1 Cache
320 KB
320 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V7000GeForce GTX 860M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V7000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 860M has 2 GB. The FirePro V7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V7000) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 860M) — the GeForce GTX 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V7000GeForce GTX 860M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro V7000) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 860M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.

FeatureFirePro V7000GeForce GTX 860M
DirectX
12+9%
11.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
6+500%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V7000) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 860M). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 860M).

FeatureFirePro V7000GeForce GTX 860M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 2.0
Decoder
UVD
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V7000 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 860M's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 860M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro V7000GeForce GTX 860M
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
21.1
41.3+96%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 860M costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.6 (FirePro V7000) vs 61.9 (GeForce GTX 860M) — the GeForce GTX 860M offers 95.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 860M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro V7000GeForce GTX 860M
MSRP
$899
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$50-50%
Performance per Dollar
31.6
61.9+96%
Codename
Pitcairn
GM107
Release
August 27 2012
January 13 2014
Ranking
#462
#578