
FirePro V7000 vs Quadro M1200

FirePro V7000
Popular choices:

Quadro M1200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V7000 is positioned at rank #243 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M1200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V7000.
| Insight | FirePro V7000 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M1200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M1200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $100), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 154% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V7000 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+154%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V7000 and Quadro M1200

FirePro V7000
The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7000 scores 3,162 and the Quadro M1200 reaches 3,212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro M1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7000) vs 640 (Quadro M1200). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000) vs 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,162 | 3,212+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS+74% | 1.399 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V7000) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro V7000) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V7000) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7000) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,VP8 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7000 draws 150W versus the Quadro M1200's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7000) vs 350W (Quadro M1200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 45W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-9% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 21.1 | 71.4+238% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V7000 launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Quadro M1200 launched at $0 and now averages $40. The Quadro M1200 costs 60% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.6 (FirePro V7000) vs 80.3 (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 offers 154.1% better value. The Quadro M1200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $40-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.6 | 80.3+154% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GM107 |
| Release | August 27 2012 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #462 | #567 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












