
FirePro V7000

Tesla C2070
FirePro V7000 vs Tesla C2070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V7000 vs Tesla C2070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V7000 vs Tesla C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 238W, a 88W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 248mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla C2070
2011Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$899 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ❌58.7% higher power demand at 238W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7000 vs Tesla C2070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7000
The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7000 scores 3,162 and the Tesla C2070 reaches 3,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7000) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,162+1% | 3,121 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+186% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS+137% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80+43% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 896 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7000 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2070. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V7000) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2070) — the Tesla C2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro V7000) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+500% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | — |
| Decoder | UVD | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7000 draws 150W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 45.4% difference. The FirePro V7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7000) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 248mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-37% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 248mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.1+61% | 13.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V7000 came in at $899, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499. On MSRP, FirePro V7000 was 40% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.5 (FirePro V7000) vs 2.1 (Tesla C2070) — the FirePro V7000 offers 66.7% better value. The newer card here is FirePro V7000 (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899-40% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.5+67% | 2.1 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GF100 |
| Release | August 27 2012 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #462 | #575 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














